3 ms·
I'm not sure if the actual differences in energy usage are so clear cut. These charts [0], which account for the 12900K spending less time to accomplish tasks t
by tehnub 4y ago
I'm not sure if the actual differences in energy usage are so clear cut. These charts [0], which account for the 12900K spending less time to accomplish tasks than the 5950X, seem to indicate the disparity isn't so terrible. You can always under-volt too; the 13th gen press release includes charts [1] showing that the 13900k at 65W matches the performance of the 12900K at 241W.
[0]: (Search for "cumulative amount of energy required to perform Blender and x264 and x265 HandBrake workloads") https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-core-i9-12900k-and-core-i5-12600k-review-retaking-the-gaming-crown/3 https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-core-i9-12900k-an...
[1]: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/09/intels-first-13th-gen-core-cpus-include-few-surprises-but-many-cores/ https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/09/intels-first-13th-ge...
- AaronFriel 4y agoMost people don't turn their computer on to run Handbreak and turn it off immediately afterward. Hence power draw is meaningful for desktop computers, not just energy usage for a task.
- avereveard 4y agoIdle power draw is not the same as peak power draw either, these arent 'nineties chips.