3 ms·
> These guys write as though they are desk bound. Psychology is not as desk-bound of a field as you might think. Industrial Organizational Psychology does get
by 9wzYQbTYsAIc 4y ago
> These guys write as though they are desk bound.
Psychology is not as desk-bound of a field as you might think. Industrial Organizational Psychology does get into the nitty gritty of the shop floor, for example.
- tuatoru 4y agoOh, I sort of realized that. I have seen some researchers now and then at work. It was just this paper's style of writing, and the not-very-hidden assumptions and approach in the intro, that prompted me to write that.
- 9wzYQbTYsAIc 4y agoAh, that makes sense, then. I like seeing assumptions being made and brought to the forefront, as that is the basis for some powerful mathematical techniques. I do wonder, however, if the researchers are fully aware of collaborative robots. I see that a couple of their sources are based on collaborative robotics, but the authors may not have fully distinguished between collaborative and non-collaborative robots. IEEE does appear to be studying the intersection of robotics and psychology though [1]. [1] https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9515315 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9515315
- 9wzYQbTYsAIc 4y agoThis research is made all the more interesting by their use of real-world data on robot prevalence and comparing that to real-world data on trends in job searches on the internet.