3 ms·
> If you're a Linux user, Intel integrated graphics have always been the most compatible and most well-supported option. You forgot to add, "worst performing b
by indymike 4y ago
> If you're a Linux user, Intel integrated graphics have always been the most compatible and most well-supported option.
You forgot to add, "worst performing by a mile" to the feature list.
- opan 4y agoIn my experience nvidia with nouveau is slower than Intel with its free driver.
- LtWorf 4y agoI recently unplugged an nvidia card from a machine because of kernel panics with the nouveau driver. Of course I can install the proprietary one, but that means I can no longer just upgrade the system and expect it to work after reboot.
- LtWorf 4y agoA slow functioning video card is still better than a fast video card that doesn't work.
- serf 4y agonothing much slower than when an nvidia dkms process fails silently and you're left without video options at next boot -- something that generally can't happen with intel-video/linux. I get your point, but intel video options perform on par or better with regards to the most common consumer video rendering demands at this point. Video acceleration and high resolutions and multiple displays are well covered -- not everyone needs to process GPGPU workloads and play the newest games at 90FPS.
- ekianjo 4y agoCompared to other integrated graphics?