3 ms·
This is the third comment in this thread along these lines- Isn't this just splitting hairs? Is there any significant percentage of defendants in such cases tha
by kevstev 4y ago
This is the third comment in this thread along these lines- Isn't this just splitting hairs? Is there any significant percentage of defendants in such cases that have judgements like this against them that don't actually appeal and just write a check on the spot?
I am asking honestly here- I am not sure if this is just typical engineer type "well actually..." type stuff going on, or if some attempt to downplay and discredit the judgement.
- anigbrowl 4y agoNo, it's just the semantic ambiguity. I think more people should rewrite HN headlines for clarity when they're confusing (in this case, the BBC subsequently changed the headline but it doesn't auto-update on HN).