4 ms·
> but this breathless "for the sake of the world don't ever use PayPal" You know, I've been working on my condescension. I really have – my last girlfriend hat
by danilocampos 15y ago
> but this breathless "for the sake of the world don't ever use PayPal"
You know, I've been working on my condescension. I really have – my last girlfriend hated that shit. And it's gotten a lot better. But you just had to use a cutely loaded little word like "histrionic," so there's really no other course...
So what I'd like to do now is offer a brief explanation of how quotation marks work.
Generally, quotation marks are used to attribute their contained content, verbatim, to a specific person. By including words in quotation marks you are saying, in effect, "this person said precisely this."
I did not say precisely what you quoted. What I said instead (handily, the text is right there), was that for all our futures, where we is a group of people who care about building things and getting paid, that we shouldn't pin our hopes on a company that can declare our money limbo-ed on a whim. The more who avoid PayPal as a result of their flakiness, the brighter the future looks for a sane payment processing landscape.
It's okay to have policies. It's okay to have business models you will and won't support. What isn't okay is to both handle large sums of people's money and make your customer service a recourse-free black box at the same time.
- non123 15y ago> A single word or a short phrase may be enclosed in quotation marks to indicate ironic use. http://www.wikihow.com/Use-Quotation-Marks-Correctly http://www.wikihow.com/Use-Quotation-Marks-Correctly I think it was pretty clear that this was the case, when I read it didn't make me think that you said that.
- billswift 15y ago> A single word or a short phrase may be enclosed in quotation marks to indicate ironic use. Normally, yes. But the primary use of quotation marks is to quote - in a direct response to something someone wrote, you come across as either dishonest or stupid if you claim to be using them ironically.
- scott_s 15y agoWhen I read gergles's comment, it was clear to me that he was describing a class of sentiment, and not directly quoting who he replied to. The manner in which he did it is, to me, idiomatic English.