3 ms·
I have definitely been wrong about technology before, prime example was camera phones when the first appeared; couldn't for the life of me see the point. With
by account-5 4y ago
I have definitely been wrong about technology before, prime example was camera phones when the first appeared; couldn't for the life of me see the point.
With that caveat, I don't get how this makes employees/customers/clients more engaged/productive or form rapport/have better experiences.
Like the Facebook thing I'm definitely not using anything that has to be this massively invasive (eye tracking, facial recognition, etc) from an advert company.
- spoonjim 4y agoThe desire to connect across distance is very real. Grandparents want to see their grandkids, customers want to see their vendors, friends want to see each other.
- Someone1234 4y agoIndeed. And the market has a lot of products that already attempt to address that. Aside from being physically bigger and therefore more expensive, what is the value-add to this for those scenarios? We'd all love a 65" window to stay in touch with loved ones, but the price is the problem not the tech. This doesn't attempt to address the economics, and to be honest I'm not sure what is new or interesting about Starline?
- kevinventullo 4y agoIt’s not just a screen, it projects different images to your eyeballs to give the illusion of depth.
- Someone1234 4y agoSo it is a screen you have to sit in an exact arch and that costs yet even more.
- kevinventullo 4y agoNo, the eyeball tracking means you can move around and get the depth perception as you move. It seems like potentially very cool technology, I don’t understand this negativity.