4 ms·
If that's true, I'd love to see how exactly they calculated that.
by Cyberdog 4y ago
If that's true, I'd love to see how exactly they calculated that.
- shagie 4y agoThe breakdown of the damages - https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/12/us/politics/alex-jones-damages.html?unlocked_article_code=aWQWThgc7xsEoP9Gnnwx-lyofZKYF9UOWfzDJrIbXu1LB5JUR7sDGKaysm2kMhBVsqbBnTzJGAcgqpg0XNudely7gnnXniEPe4NwhUiDld5sTbEAqyH5Y3WwJowS767Acm7fG6-jdVzhqE3qDi-kU3Hh4yEP9Jf6PHztYGDnS4Jc2KxWDd3OdHPAV-XmKooqZ1zbqh0svua2LaHTpUgDDM3hxK4iBcGoXdzMEy19IZY9y3VrlUq6VlS7WokmkB0J1AZu0zwJtonhsIdDUTkrmFnYXHlX_XI5QG11Jcr1oo5GZkMEmBXCuLpj49mzipyVeJOOqCrPkmyCvYVxlviTGw&smid=share-url https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/12/us/politics/alex-jones-da...
- Cyberdog 4y ago> Defamation/slander damages, past and future: $60 million That's not much of a breakdown, and if anything it seems to go against the idea that these dollar amounts aren't punitive. Are we supposed to assume that that particular plaintiff would have been $60 million richer if Jones hadn't had said what he said? Ridiculous. The emotional distress damages are more subjective, of course, but I still don't see the amounts as any less punitive at this point.