3 ms·
This thread seems to get derailed into the age old anarchistic debate "organization or not", also sometimes named "platform or not". My take on it is that this
by lapinot 4y ago
This thread seems to get derailed into the age old anarchistic debate "organization or not", also sometimes named "platform or not". My take on it is that this debate is usually theoretic in nature (in particular in this thread), and that anarchism is very much not a theory and actually a praxis. A core principle is also to refuse bottom-line-truth and dogma to keep being relevant in day-to-day struggles. Hence the unifying principles of the anarchistic nebula elude any objective definition (one behave "like an anarchist" only if a couple other ones says so, not that this would be sufficient tho).
- ewzimm 4y agoConstantly renegotiating definitions comes with the territory, so I wouldn’t expect this to go away. The name is meant to be provocative, so it fits. Defining it outside theory is an interesting take. But doesn’t praxis eventually require considering theory when a decision has to be made?