5 ms·
I think you're fighting a losing battle here, sorry to say. This sort of thing has been going on for a while. "Terrific" hasn't meant "inspiring terror" for a
by Turing_Machine 4y ago
I think you're fighting a losing battle here, sorry to say. This sort of thing has been going on for a while.
"Terrific" hasn't meant "inspiring terror" for a very long time.
- ggm 4y agoDecimate this comment thread!
- sfink 4y agoI agree, we should decmate this commen tread.
- pessimizer 4y agoWe're still going to need a word for "exponentially" though, and it would help if that word contained "exponent." "Terrific" is an unnecessary word in English, just because we have a ton of words for things that inspire fear. "Exponentially" being used to mean "a lot" is bad not because it's a new usage, but because "exponentially" is being demoted to a word that has a bunch (a shitload, a fuckton, lots, plenty, too many) synonyms when in its accurate usage it's a word with few or none. You're losing meaning when you make a thing more complicated to say. Of course, this sort of usage happens a lot, too, but it's always because some people are using a technical-sounding word to substitute for a common word in order to give the impression of expertise.* ----- * as opposed to when technicians steal a common word and make it a very specific technical term, which also happens all the time.
- postultimate 4y agoWe can go back to saying "geometrically", which was the previous term for multiplicative increase. It even has the advantage of being confusing when misused.