2 ms·
I am more concerned with the people participating in the other side of this exchange. If somebody wants to get a gun out of their house so they can stop worry
by MichaelCollins 4y ago
I am more concerned with the people participating in the other side of this exchange. If somebody wants to get a gun out of their house so they can stop worrying about it and want it destroyed, then the money is unnecessary. If the money is their motive for selling their gun to the police, then they should be given fair market value. These programs are calculated to exploit people desperately in need of cash.
How would you like it if you and your whole family were poor, and you learned that your grandmother sold a $1000 rifle for $100 of walmart gift cards because she was desperate, didn't know what the gun was worth, and trusted the police to not scam her?
BTW, many of these "buyback" programs are funded by people like Doris Buffett. Run by the police but paid for by wealthy donors. They can afford to pay fair market value, they just prefer to scam people.
- tablespoon 4y ago> If the money is their motive for selling their gun to the police, then they should be given fair market value. I agree there. I guess the point I was trying to make the program's logic could mean it makes sense for it to pay more than fair market value, even for 3D printed guns. I didn't realize they could be low-balling prices and exploiting desperate people.