3 ms·
A few years ago I would have agreed, but right now Signal is doing just fine taking users from WhatsApp (FB TOS changes + ads + social group analysis)and Telegr
by dodgerdan 4y ago
A few years ago I would have agreed, but right now Signal is doing just fine taking users from WhatsApp (FB TOS changes + ads + social group analysis)and Telegram (sketchy non-e2ee, Russian owned, based in the middle east).
- monetus 4y agoWeird, I am in the southeast U.S. and telegram is eating signal's lunch in the social networks here.
- dodgerdan 4y agoIt’s a big pie, they’re also fairly different. And to be honest it’s only a matter of time before Telegram has a (public) security incident that drives much more people to E2EE messaging.
- monetus 4y agoI'm curious how long it will be before that public incident - they rolled their own cryptography right? With that, I would imagine that if it hasn't been pwned yet, then there would be a disproportionate amount of people trying to break it.
- brational 4y agoRolled their own and off by default.
- stirfish 4y agoWhat people are concerned enough about a Terms of Service change to leave Whatsapp, but struggle with the unlocked icon next to "Insecure SMS" in Signal? What people know that Telegram isn't end-to-end encrypted, but think SMS is?