4 ms·
> Eventually, he acquired the tweets in question, and we were both stunned about why these benign tweets, which were clearly not about the company's financials,
by citilife 4y ago
> Eventually, he acquired the tweets in question, and we were both stunned about why these benign tweets, which were clearly not about the company's financials, were being flagged. Then, he finally confided in me that the person who reported this to him was the SVP I had been working with previously, Rick.
- peteradio 4y agoIf you are taking them at their word, this came directly from SVP and not some PR policy AND it was not related to financials. So are you calling OP a liar or not?
- citilife 4y ago> What was flagged?
- yellowapple 4y agoYour seemed to imply above that the SVP got involved because of already-flagged tweets, whereas the part of the story you've quoted happened after the SVP had not only met the author and appointed him to the company's social media council, but after the SVP started ghosting him. The causality you're implying (if not explying) seems inverted.