3 ms·
> In rasterization. But the future of gaming is "DLSS" and ray-tracing That's marketing BS, and today nobody is playing in the future RX 6xxx gen is 2 years o
by Kukumber 4y ago
> In rasterization. But the future of gaming is "DLSS" and ray-tracing
That's marketing BS, and today nobody is playing in the future
RX 6xxx gen is 2 years old already ;), and yet it does better for todays needs and for already released games
That's not the case for the Intel lineup
- BuckRogers 4y agoThat's marketing BS, and today nobody is playing in the future That's not what I meant. I meant DLSS and RTX are the technologies that GPU companies should be focused on. Intel and Nvidia are focused on those things. But DLSS/RTX are the present and future of gaming. RX 6xxx gen is 2 years old already ;), and yet it does better for todays needs and for already released games That's not the case for the Intel lineup At some price points, in some games, yes. You could say that about all 3 vendors. There's no outright win, especially for AMD and Intel. They battle in the price/performance field. If anyone has an outright win on performance, it's only Nvidia.