3 ms·
It's because you're only looking at top 1% questions/answers. Once you get to the less popular ones, that aren't viewed by tens of thousands, hundreds of thousa
by KptMarchewa 4y ago
It's because you're only looking at top 1% questions/answers. Once you get to the less popular ones, that aren't viewed by tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, or even millions of people then you get what OP described.
- vbezhenar 4y agoHere are my three latest questions: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/72366267/matching-ip-address-with-authorizehttprequests https://stackoverflow.com/questions/72366267/matching-ip-add... https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71374202/why-mov-instruction-is-replaced-by-add-instruction https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71374202/why-mov-instruc... https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70738756/proper-way-to-use-multiple-transactions-in-a-single-class https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70738756/proper-way-to-u... I got what I'd call high-quality answers and I'm completely satisfied by that experience. Those questions are not top 1%.
- MontyCarloHall 4y agoOK, here are some more obscure questions straight from my browser history whose answers I also find to be very high quality: "how to change scope of np.seterr" https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53634965/change-np-seterr-behavior-inside-a-function-only https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53634965/change-np-seter... "bash set dummy exit code" https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/626723/is-there-a-simple-bash-command-which-just-sets-the-exit-code https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/626723/is-there-a-s... "Java lossy conversion from int to short" https://stackoverflow.com/questions/24173965/possible-lossy-conversion-from-int-to-short https://stackoverflow.com/questions/24173965/possible-lossy-...
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]