2 ms·

I don't really believe these claims of "Wokepedia", because no-one making these claims has presented actual evidence. I'm sure you have some though, otherwise

I don't really believe these claims of "Wokepedia", because no-one making these claims has presented actual evidence. I'm sure you have some though, otherwise commenting as you did would mean you'd be as guilty of "not keeping your politics in your pants" as you accuse Wikipedia of being.

naasking 4y ago
> I don't really believe these claims of "Wokepedia" I expect this would qualify. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund which also links to: https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2020/06/03/we-stand-for-racial-justice/ https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2020/06/03/we-stand-for... Most people would probably place a lot of this firmly in the "woke" category.
- jwond 4y ago
  > The Wikimedia Foundation defines racial equity as shifting away from Eurocentricity, White-male-imperialist-patriarchal supremacy, superiority, power and privilege Well then. That makes it perfectly clear that Wikimedia is under the sway of partisan activists.