5 ms·

File a bug. This seems like the kind of thing that Apple would actually fix. https://bugreport.apple.com/ https://bugreport.apple.com/

• drivingmenuts 15y ago
  Or not. OS X should be agnostic about the software running on it. If you fix it for Emacs, then it should also be fixed for vi users and nano users, etc. some of which are mutually exclusive.
  • macrael 15y ago
    The point is that all generic text fields on OSX have supported Emacs keybindings since forever, not vi or nano keybindings.
    • throw_away 15y ago
      though, this thread just makes me want vi bindings in os x text areas. I would settle for shell bindings that can change the cursor shape.
  • dylangs1030 15y ago
    A company can fix a problem without sponsoring a product associated with the problem, just like a company can release a product for a competing platform.
    • deleted 15y ago
      [deleted]
      • omaranto 15y ago
        He doesn't want the key binding to be Emacs-like he wants to go back to being the way it was before this random change, the way he had already gotten used to. That is, he wants it to be Apple-like again. (It happens that the old Apple way and the Emacs way coincide, which is probably what confused you.)