4 ms·

I don't quite understand the "Every 100ms faster → 1% more conversions" tag line (in the context of how Qwik improves over competitors) AFAIK Qwik would have a

I don't quite understand the "Every 100ms faster → 1% more conversions" tag line (in the context of how Qwik improves over competitors) AFAIK Qwik would have a similar initial load time to other server-side rendered frameworks where all you send across the wire first is the HTML and CSS to render that particular page. That's the initial page load. From there it loads the JS which then hydrates data and turns it into a functioning React app. So what Qwik claims to improve over other solutions is the time-to-interactive metric, rather than the initial page load. Is this a correct assessment? If so, then the "100ms -> 1% more conversions" buy line does not seem to really follow on from the actual improvements of Qwik over other methods. Anyone understand this more than me?

satvikchoudhary 4y ago
I think your understanding of hydration is correct. The 100ms -> 1% line comes from amazon. https://dexter.agency/blog/100ms-faster-1-more-revenue-how-speed-affects-your-revenue/ https://dexter.agency/blog/100ms-faster-1-more-revenue-how-s... I feel time-to-interactive is more important than just the page load as a user, so I can see why it would matter. There is a trick in remix which improves user experience somewhat. https://twitter.com/ryanflorence/status/1547959632663961602?s=20&t=PKJPaA6NDfxnWar4W5Crig https://twitter.com/ryanflorence/status/1547959632663961602?... Qwik also saves on network bandwidth. The benfits of qwik will be felt most on slow network connections and old mobile devices. Feel free to correct me if I got something wrong.
christophilus 4y ago
I’ll never use Citi Bank intentionally due to what appears to be hydration. Every. Single. Time. I log in to pay my Costco card, I click the login form to start autofill, and when I’m almost ready to submit, the entire page redraws and I have to start over. Time to interactive matters. At least in this sample size of 1, I will choose a competitor, all else being equal.
- aatd86 4y ago
  That might not be hydration but third party script delaying the main js file perhaps? Hydration shouldn't take that long depending on the frameworks. Frameworks that rerender such as react are probably more problematic.

satvikchoudhary 4y ago

I think your understanding of hydration is correct. The 100ms -> 1% line comes from amazon. https://dexter.agency/blog/100ms-faster-1-more-revenue-how-speed-affects-your-revenue/ https://dexter.agency/blog/100ms-faster-1-more-revenue-how-s... I feel time-to-interactive is more important than just the page load as a user, so I can see why it would matter. There is a trick in remix which improves user experience somewhat. https://twitter.com/ryanflorence/status/1547959632663961602?s=20&t=PKJPaA6NDfxnWar4W5Crig https://twitter.com/ryanflorence/status/1547959632663961602?... Qwik also saves on network bandwidth. The benfits of qwik will be felt most on slow network connections and old mobile devices. Feel free to correct me if I got something wrong.

christophilus 4y ago

I’ll never use Citi Bank intentionally due to what appears to be hydration. Every. Single. Time. I log in to pay my Costco card, I click the login form to start autofill, and when I’m almost ready to submit, the entire page redraws and I have to start over. Time to interactive matters. At least in this sample size of 1, I will choose a competitor, all else being equal.

aatd86 4y ago
That might not be hydration but third party script delaying the main js file perhaps? Hydration shouldn't take that long depending on the frameworks. Frameworks that rerender such as react are probably more problematic.