No. You get gatekeeping and laziness and stale group think and unstated quid pro quo and discrimination. It's worse science. A famous name getting the same pap

No. You get gatekeeping and laziness and stale group think and unstated quid pro quo and discrimination. It's worse science. A famous name getting the same paper published easier is a failure of peer review. The whole point of science is that ideas and evidence stands on its own merit. Not celebrity or seniority or power or any other axis that doesn't matter.