Most people would agree that something like feeding starving babies is a worthy apolitical cause. But few that are donating to an online encyclopedia foundation

Most people would agree that something like feeding starving babies is a worthy apolitical cause. But few that are donating to an online encyclopedia foundation would want their money to be redirected to babies. Otherwise they would have given that directly. That's what I see as the core issue here, rather than the minutia of whether some particular charity money went to is an ok cause