4 ms·

You are totally right, thank you for the pertinent comment and I will correct that. This is one of the first cli's I had not thought of at all.

• rcthompson 4y ago
  I think the trash interaction command needs to be a different main command, actually. No matter what you call the option, someone can make a file with that name.
  • vore 4y ago
    Usually tools support a `--` option for that, e.g. with `rm`: rm -- --file-that-looks-like-a-flag
    • ben0x539 4y ago
      rm ./--file-that-looks-like-a-flag ;) (I'm always half-tempted to suggest that a "strict mode" shell should require all paths in arguments to start with either / or ./ so that anything else is unambiguously not a file.) (I spent a bunch of time with a file named -i in my home directory, you know, just in case.)
      • Amine_Ztn 4y ago
        thank you for your feedback, I take it all into consideration, I will try to fix it during the day :D
      • saba2008 4y ago
        At least globbing should return fully qualified paths (not sure there is an established term for `(<directory>/)+<file>' paths, as opposed to `<file>` ones).
  • kevincox 4y ago
    I agree. rmt-flush and rmt-list would be great options.
• kseistrup 4y ago
  Also, the `trash_` is redundant, so `rmt --display` et cetera is all enough (and please make short options like `-d` too).