4 ms·
Me: let's not do <thing> unless we have a reason. You: We should continue doing <thing> because we already do <thing> "carry on" is not a reason to do anythin
by zasdffaa 4y ago
Me: let's not do <thing> unless we have a reason.
You: We should continue doing <thing> because we already do <thing>
"carry on" is not a reason to do anything. I literally can't understand how you are thinking to post such a non-justification.
- 1970-01-01 4y agoSorry, I don't understand where you are going with this comment. I was explaining how UV can be used to save energy. You're arguing against that?
- funnymony 4y agoGP argues against killing microbes. (With some nuance)
- zasdffaa 4y agoIf you're talking cost then maybe. In the right places such as hospitals, very likely. I'm questioning that we should do that indiscriminately in other places such as in homes. We have highly developed immune systems, let's not risk weakening them. And not doing it costs nothing at all.
- bobsmooth 4y agoGerms cause disease. I know germ theory is pretty new but its established science.