4 ms·
I'd like to understand the motivation behind your question. Complaining about the unobscured faces would start the conversation about training data and its dim
by Nzen 4y ago
I'd like to understand the motivation behind your question.
Complaining about the unobscured faces would start the conversation about training data and its diminished inclusivity. But, your comment focused on the perception a person looking at the result might have, given the incomplete feature set of this software. I am having trouble imagining the sort of visitor xrd would disappoint with the imperfect image, that he should want to have retained, that wouldn't complain when noticing the gap him or herself during testing.
Could you please elaborate ?
- charcircuit 4y agoUsually when showing off a project it makes sense to show it working correctly. The first photo shows that the software doesn't work consistently which could give someone a bad first impression. It's not like the photo is in a section that is about its limitation, but in a section introducing the project.
- bigiain 4y agoSometimes doing that is just bullshit though. If your face detection works 80% or 95% of the time, don't try and deceive me into thinking it's 100% accurate, only to leave me disappointed when I go through the effort of downloading/configuring/testing it and then find out it's worse that the solution I'm trying to replace.