I really disagree. Enforcing HTTPS is bad enough, but refusing to support plain HTTP for trivial sites is just arrogant and user hostile. Say I don't care abo

I really disagree. Enforcing HTTPS is bad enough, but refusing to support plain HTTP for trivial sites is just arrogant and user hostile. Say I don't care about the possibility of some of my magazine subscriptions being tampered with. Sure, put some kind of security in place for things that are delivering me important sensitive information — like official government information? I don't know. Forcing that down my throat for Fishing Weekly though, is just pointless. Oh, did hackers change the weight of that record fish? Oh no! "But security!" is the new "Think of the children".