8 ms·

Maybe they actually think it's realistic to hire a couple of million people to screen online content. After all, they have more than a billion people, and they

• pork 15y ago
  You do realize that not all of India, especially its politicians, are involved in call center activities, correct? I hope you also realize that life in India doesn't revolve around call centers, even though that's the most contact with India many westerners have.
  • kijin 15y ago
    Of course I understand that call centers make up only a tiny part of the Indian economy. But I can certainly imagine these politicians thinking, "Wouldn't it be really easy for Google and Facebook to hire a few thousand people here in India (who know the language, culture, etc.) to monitor the web in real time?" Hiring human censors would be completely unrealistic in countries like the United States, but maybe it doesn't sound so far-fetched in countries with low wages and a large population.
    • movingahead 15y ago
      Do you understand that a country with a large population will also have a large amount of user-generated content? It is not people with low wages, but court of law which should have the power to decide what content is inflammatory. The meaning of freedom and democracy doesn't vary with amount of population.
      • kijin 15y ago
        > It is not people with low wages, but court of law which should have the power to decide what content is inflammatory I completely agree with you. It's Mr. Sibal who seems to think that human censors are not only a good idea but also realistic.