Why should SIM registrations map 1:1 with population? Mayhaps they wish to make it more difficult to use SIMs as a 1:1 personal identifier, requiring authoriti

Why should SIM registrations map 1:1 with population? Mayhaps they wish to make it more difficult to use SIMs as a 1:1 personal identifier, requiring authorities and each other to interpret them as handset/endpoint identifiers only, as Zul intended? Or perhaps third parties are using lax policies in indonesia as a jumping off point for getting into the telecom network? Or your count isn't taking into account legal fictions as the purchaser of multiple endpoints? The reasons are myriad.