Isn't what gp is doing the opposite, and is in fact blaming the system developed (needle stations) for abnormally concentrating drug users on an area? I don't

Isn't what gp is doing the opposite, and is in fact blaming the system developed (needle stations) for abnormally concentrating drug users on an area? I don't know why such an admittedly anecdotal observation has generated such response... Its not that hard to at least entertain the idea that clean drug-equipment stations might have side effects and impacts to the surrounding community that haven't been properly studied yet, etc.