3 ms·
"It does without a performance penalty" yeah. it's already so terribly slow that it's unlikely that taking snapshots can make it any slower :-D
by harvie 4y ago
"It does without a performance penalty"
yeah. it's already so terribly slow that it's unlikely that taking snapshots can make it any slower :-D
- Volundr 4y agoThat was not my experience with NILFS. It outperformed ext4 on my laptop NVME.
- harvie 4y agoi think i was running it on 6TB conventional HDD RAID1. also note that the read and write speeds might be quite asymetrical... in general also depends on workload type.
- akvadrako 4y agoThe benchmarks here look pretty bad: https://www.phoronix.com/review/linux-58-filesystems/4 https://www.phoronix.com/review/linux-58-filesystems/4
- Volundr 4y agoThe last page looks pretty bad. If you look at the others it's more of a mixed bag, but yeah. I don't remember what benchmark I ran before deciding to run it on my laptop. Given my work at the time probably pgbench, but I couldn't say for sure. It was long enough ago I also might've been benchmarking against ext3, not 4.