4 ms·
> that it assumes the public is too dumb to hear nuance It is! It empirically is! Don't assume it, test it!
by savingsPossible 4y ago
> that it assumes the public is too dumb to hear nuance
It is! It empirically is! Don't assume it, test it!
- mistermann 4y agoWhile composing this comment, did you consider that the dimension of time is implicit (and hidden from perception) in the version of "is" that you are using here? Also hidden: sub-perceptual heuristics. And culture. And surely many other things beyond my knowledge. The hard problem of consciousness is so poorly understood by science, I wonder if that is why it is simply ~ignored in conversations like this, where it is so fundamentally important.