It doesn't have to be Malthusianism at all, that is a reductionist perspective. There is an earth overshoot day and some resources simply cannot be restored or

It doesn't have to be Malthusianism at all, that is a reductionist perspective. There is an earth overshoot day and some resources simply cannot be restored or extracted with increased productivity. You could argue that there would be enough production capital to feed everyone. There certainly is and then some. But that is certainly not the whole story. Imagine our resource consumption if everyone lived to western standards. I don't know how you can simultaneously argue that anthropological climate change exists but a large human population is irrelevant. Doesn't make sense it seems.