2 ms·
>What’s being proposed for Go is instead a breaking change. It sounds like you only get the breaking change in modules that require above a certain version of
by foldr 4y ago
>What’s being proposed for Go is instead a breaking change.
It sounds like you only get the breaking change in modules that require above a certain version of Go. So this should not break old code. It's perhaps more analogous to the way that "use strict" in JavaScript 'breaks' parsing of octal constants.
- chrismorgan 4y agoAh, my apologies; I missed that part. (I last used Go a decade ago, long before go.mod.) Then this seems fairly reasonable, given also how rarely things will depend on one way or the other.