3 ms·
No, which is explained in TFA
by corndoge 4y ago
No, which is explained in TFA
- walterbell 4y agoBecause of the 'hardware' clause? What stops them from expanding the scope later? Why would any business want to use a codec associated with patent trolls? Are there other IETF protocols subject to retroactive patents?
- chrismorgan 4y ago> What stops them from expanding the scope later? Especially given that they explicitly include software in the patent pool subject matter! From https://www.opuspool.com/ https://www.opuspool.com/: > The Opus pool license covers the specifications […], and the official software releases of the Opus audio codec, […]
- girvo 4y ago> What stops them from expanding the scope later Absolutely nothing, because their own patent pool docs state that software is fair game. It's gross beyond belief.