> Do you think those are all morally wrong as well? They could be, if one considers the negative morality of non-voluntary, force-backed extraction greater tha

> Do you think those are all morally wrong as well? They could be, if one considers the negative morality of non-voluntary, force-backed extraction greater than the positive morality gained by its (partial) redistribution. Another opinion one could have is that the first part being morally negative makes the whole affair morally wrong, regardless of any positive upside.