3 ms·
> just pays for MS Windows. Paying for MS Windows is not a problem. If I could just throw money at Microsoft and have all the apps I need running on Linux, I w
by outworlder 4y ago
> just pays for MS Windows.
Paying for MS Windows is not a problem. If I could just throw money at Microsoft and have all the apps I need running on Linux, I would have. I suspect many people (and specially orgs) would have done that too.
Incidentally, I have a copy of MS Windows. I just _don't want to boot Windows_
> It pays a lot of attention tp running old(er) popular software smoothly.
Nah. It pays attention to popular software, period. Because that's how contributions normally work. The more people interested, the more likely a patch will land. It can take significant effort to run some software. That takes time. By the time it's running perfectly, it's "old" software.
It just needs effort. One of the bad things about the Stadia demise is that some of the work done on the titles themselves benefit Wine. For example, Cyberpunk was perfectly playable on launch day.
- aargh_aargh 4y ago> Incidentally, I have a copy of MS Windows. I just _don't want to boot Windows_ Might be incidental in your case, but not in general: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bundling_of_Microsoft_Windows https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bundling_of_Microsoft_Windows
- BlueTemplar 4y agoOh wow, Stadia is already dead ?! Google has "outdone" themselves !