4 ms·
You mean that people just don’t sort their garbage at all, the company does it for them? Is it technically plausible, with decent material recovery levels? Don’
by zoul 15y ago
You mean that people just don’t sort their garbage at all, the company does it for them? Is it technically plausible, with decent material recovery levels? Don’t the recyclable materials lose value by putting them together with regular garbage?
- drunkpotato 15y ago> You mean that people just don’t sort their garbage at all, the company does it for them? Yes, precisely. The usual caveats apply: no hazardous waste (hazardous chemicals, biohazard waste). > Is it technically plausible, with decent material recovery levels? It seems to be, based on Charlottesville's experience. I don't know the recovery levels. That is a good topic for research. > Don’t the recyclable materials lose value by putting them together with regular garbage? They do, but my understanding is the lost value is much less than relying on residential pre-sorting of recyclable materials. The idea is not to compare the efficacy of single-stream with a hypothetically perfect human recycler, but with recycling rates in actual practice among residents after decades of attempted recycling education. I was told by a reporter in Charlottesville that single-stream compares favorably, but I am having trouble finding actual rates for comparison in my quick Googling today. So if you're interested, take my comment as a basis for further research into the issue.