3 ms·
Not a physicist, but your argument is pretty unconvincing in that it relies entirely on intuition about classical physics, ignoring quantum phenomena entirely.
by empyrrhicist 4y ago
Not a physicist, but your argument is pretty unconvincing in that it relies entirely on intuition about classical physics, ignoring quantum phenomena entirely. If one were to argue that probability were fundamental, they'd very likely start by describing wave functions, which are probabilistic and seem pretty close to fundamental to observable reality.