3 ms·
That suggests something strange though – that those who were invited but non-tested were more likely to die of colon cancer than non-invitie non-testers.
by akvadrako 4y ago
That suggests something strange though – that those who were invited but non-tested were more likely to die of colon cancer than non-invitie non-testers.
- zerocrates 4y agoI suppose that by refusing to get a colonoscopy even when specifically prompted to do so, you're maybe sorting yourself into a more "unhealthy" group than the general population of non-colonoscopy-havers.
- robertlagrant 4y agoThat would make the outcome less surprising.
- bluGill 4y agoIt would be unethical to refuse to invite someone with a family history of colon cancer. Thus I think it is perfectly reasonable to assume there is something different.