>I beg to differ. Maybe you think cultists should be killed, but I think they should be helped to understand their relationship and find a way to free themselve

>I beg to differ. Maybe you think cultists should be killed, but I think they should be helped to understand their relationship and find a way to free themselves from that control. The very fact you are calling somebody a stochastic terrorist is in fact stochastic terrorism. Why do you think I think cultists should be killed? Regardless, just because I don't think cultists should be killed doesn't mean your rhetoric isn't likely to cause violence. That is the only thing that matters when it comes to stochastic terrorism. >I'm also curious as to what you think comprises a cult and any examples of such. And if one is a member of a cult how that person should be "dealt with". You are the one calling people cultists. You should be defining it not me. >I'm also curious as to if there is anything that Trump could do or say that would cause you to no longer support him What makes you think I support Trump? I just don't like giant multi billion dollar companies suppressing speech under false pretenses. I would be making the same arguments for any person removed under false pretenses. >My goal of engaging with you is not to make you wrong or me right -- it's about finding some common areas of agreement that we can find come together as a country to make things better. It unfortunately looks like that may not be possible and that fills me with despair. Maybe we can find common ground on these statements: - social media companies should not lie about their reasons on banning people. - social media companies should have specific and clear rules - social media companies should only ban people for violating their rules or when directly required to by a legal order