3 ms·
There's nothing terroristic about killing civilians on a bridge. A bridge is a valid military target (esp. in this case), and so bombing the bridge is fine in
by midoridensha 4y ago
There's nothing terroristic about killing civilians on a bridge. A bridge is a valid military target (esp. in this case), and so bombing the bridge is fine in a war. If civilians are on the bridge and die, too bad: that's what happens in a war.
Bombing a hospital or a school is terroristic and illegal according to the rules of war.
- graymatters 4y agoUnless combatants are using the school or the hospital to conduct their acts of war from it.
- simion314 4y agoSure, but the case with the hospital, the malls and today bombing was just random acts of terror but Russia would claim that 3 different official lies by 3 different officials before they converge one something ridiculous like "in fact we were targeting some military stuff 1 km away but Igor was drunk entered coordinates wrong"