3 ms·
You went to the website for some purpose no? So you'd rather not have gone to the website at all? So why did you attempt to visit the website in the first place
by ApolloFortyNine 4y ago
You went to the website for some purpose no? So you'd rather not have gone to the website at all? So why did you attempt to visit the website in the first place?
It's just so irresponsible to take extremes like this, ignoring the amount of information and entertainment available on the internet.
- aksss 4y agoAn internet maturing over twenty years full of hobbyist bloggers and forums rather than megacorp media and affiliate review sites is a world I’d be curious to experience.
- qu4z-2 4y agoIn my experience, the number of ads, cookie banner shenanigans, and embedded Twitch streams is inversely correlated with the usefulness and quality of the website. Maybe if all of these websites went away, I could actually find useful information or entertainment on Google.
- account42 4y agoYes, I'd rather go to the ad-free website that they displaced (or at least out-SEO'd).
- abofh 4y agoLook at the cookie consent page of any news article you read - your article is worth often 100+ people sharing my data. It's not, it's just not. Do you know how many people get access to my search data? One. But your news article is worth 100x. How many get access to my streaming preferences? One. But your news article needs to violate my privacy 100x more. Your arguments are sound in an imaginary world where six seconds of attention is worth being followed around for years. No.