Hold up... > apparently you feel that a better system must catch more of the thieves, and you've offered no argument for that beyond that you don't seem to see

Hold up... > apparently you feel that a better system must catch more of the thieves, and you've offered no argument for that beyond that you don't seem to see a difference between "more" and "not less" Where did I say or imply that. I asked if other countries were doing things that could [X=reduce false positives] and [Y=reduce false negatives]. That's not presenting an argument. If there are ways to reduce false positives without necessarily reducing false negatives, I didn't ask for those, though, it'd be interesting for discussion.