3 ms·
If beyond a reasonable doubt is required to convict someone, shouldn't we overturn the conviction as soon as reasonable doubt is introduced? Why would it be des
by Volundr 4y ago
If beyond a reasonable doubt is required to convict someone, shouldn't we overturn the conviction as soon as reasonable doubt is introduced? Why would it be desirable that we uphold a conviction that shouldn't have been handed down in the first place if the information was discovered before instead of after the verdict?