3 ms·
> The other thing is, do we really want a sacred caste of people who can't be criticized? This gets uncomfortably close to the incredibly oppressive lèse-majest
by RosanaAnaDana 4y ago
> The other thing is, do we really want a sacred caste of people who can't be criticized? This gets uncomfortably close to the incredibly oppressive lèse-majesté laws that some jurisdictions have.
That's effectively what a supreme court justice said should be the case last week.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/09/29/supreme-court-roberts-kagan-legitimacy/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/09/29/supreme-c...
- hexis 4y ago"“All of our opinions are open to criticism,” Roberts said in remarks to judges and lawyers. “In fact, our members do a great job of criticizing some opinions from time to time. But simply because people disagree with an opinion is not a basis for criticizing the legitimacy of the court.”" Were you thinking of a different quote from your source? This quote, which seemed closest to your intent, does not at all say what you were suggesting.
- bee_rider 4y agoI don't think that's what it being said there. Conservatives on the Supreme Court are being whiny babies about the criticism that their obviously biased rulings are getting (and if we ever get an unbiased court, these rulings will all be thrown out ASAP), but none are actually suggesting that that criticism should be illegal as far as I've seen.