PayPal has not stopped their freeze/seize gambit. A few examples of these clauses being exercised were on HN (both cases pending) - https://news.ycombinator.co

PayPal has not stopped their freeze/seize gambit. A few examples of these clauses being exercised were on HN (both cases pending) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29935515 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29935515 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32739950 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32739950 If it wasn't obvious, cherry-picking bits and pieces from various jurisdictions isn't legal; PayPal deftly deflects any legal challenges to their various dispersed entities making them essentially untouchable if you don't have unlimited resources. If anyone is interested, in the EU, this is their playbook: - Ignore all communications unless it's a C&D from lawyers - Deflect responsibility to PayPal Luxembourg. - They have, or have had literally 90% of LU lawyers retained, meaning your case will not / cannot be accepted by the majority of LU law-firms due to conflict of interest - Deflect onto the CSSF (Luxembourg Monetary Watchdog) - Respond to the CSSF that the complaining company is not based in Luxembourg, which results in the CSSF concluding that they are not the competent structure to rule. - Case closed, your funds have been stolen, and PayPal has artfully dodged the relevant regulatory bodies.