3 ms·
That reply is garbage (deliberately?) The union is trying to do good for employees. In a better climate, Starbucks would be working with its unions to make sur
by acr25 4y ago
That reply is garbage (deliberately?)
The union is trying to do good for employees. In a better climate, Starbucks would be working with its unions to make sure that things for ALL employees are better.
- junofan 4y agoCoffee shops are extremely cheap to start up. Why can’t union organizers start better coffee shops?
- jmpman 4y agoStarbucks is not a coal mine. They’re located on street corners with other restaurants, and the employees can freely move from one unskilled role to the next. Unionization exists solely to extract additional wages that wouldn’t have been given willingly. They’re effectively extorting Starbucks. Same as any con trying to extort protection money from a shop.
- klyrs 4y agoSo if you say to your employer "oh hey I've found a new job that's offering me $20k more than I'm making right now" and offer them a chance to match that offer, is that also extortion in your mind?
- jmpman 4y agoNo, but if you say, hey, we’re all going to burn down the store if you down pay us $20k more… that’s more like what a union is threatening. There’s practically no limit on what a union can extort from a company. If a company invests in capital to make its employees more efficient (faster coffee grinders - if we’re keeping with the Starbucks theme), then the union can demand that savings in their wages. Unionization makes it less likely for businesses to make these capital investments. My theory is that’s why almost no airlines have ever been profitable. All the gains in cost/passenger seat mile gets taken by the pilot unions.