4 ms·
> I haven't seen anyone suggesting that Amazon ban teens from buying the book, just the dangerous chemicals. Thus proposing a new system of age restrictions, w
by Someone1234 4y ago
> I haven't seen anyone suggesting that Amazon ban teens from buying the book, just the dangerous chemicals.
Thus proposing a new system of age restrictions, which can be re-used for other things once they exist.
> And calling that "censorship" seems silly.
The lawsuit is asking Amazon to stop sharing information, or associating that information in particular ways, that is in fact censorship.
> What else would you call a bundle of items consisting of a book with instructions on a way to commit suicide, plus all of the materials needed to do so?
I'd call it an automated "Frequently purchased together" recommendation.
- GoldenMonkey 4y agoChildren do not have the kinds of rights you think they should have. And until they are adults, we protect them from harm. And society is obligated to not work against our societal norms. Amazon will lose this case and will make the necessary changes. Amazon continuously demonstrates a dirt bag mentality. Few employees last more than 6 months and they have such a bad reputation. And the more we know about there shady ways… the worse it gets. Because society values family and children more than ‘censorship concerns’.