4 ms·
There are many suit and claims against Paypal. Most of them are settled out of court. Many are exactly about account freezing. The fact that one went to court b
by pierrebai 4y ago
There are many suit and claims against Paypal. Most of them are settled out of court. Many are exactly about account freezing. The fact that one went to court but was dismissed does not prove that Paypal does not engage in bad bahaviour.
It's not merely the cost of doing business, it's the cost of avoiding judgements against bad practices.
Do note that Paypal did lose some suits, notably in Quebec for example, where customers protection laws are stronger and arbitration clauses in user agreements cannot force you to forfeit rights you have under the law, in particular to sue.
https://lastattorney.com/paypal-class-action-lawsuit-settlement-announced/ https://lastattorney.com/paypal-class-action-lawsuit-settlem...
- nightpool 4y agoI think you're misinterpreting my comment. I'm not saying that PayPal is good—far from it. I'm saying that the evidence that Zed has presented in favor of PayPal being good (and better then Stripe!) is one random court case that got dismissed 4 months ago, and that's completely nonsensical. I think we both agree that Zed saying "because of one random court case, PayPal has stopped freezing accounts" is just nonsense. So I'm confused about what you're actually disagreeing with with in my comment.