3 ms·

So who if so many big actors are losing interest, who is driving the ISO committee? Are we bound to see more conservative standards in the future, or are the re

So who if so many big actors are losing interest, who is driving the ISO committee? Are we bound to see more conservative standards in the future, or are the remaining people going to turn the place into even more of a madhouse?

pjmlp 4y ago
About 350 people that go through the effort to submit papers, fight for them until the voting, everything that wins feature election lands into next ISO round. Stuff being in ISO doesn't imply compiler vendors will bother with such features, see exported templates, which only EDG bothered with, everyone else ignored them, and eventually got replaced with external templates instead. EDIT: Bjarne also has only one vote like everyone else, thus this paper from him is quite relevant, https://www.stroustrup.com/P0977-remember-the-vasa.pdf https://www.stroustrup.com/P0977-remember-the-vasa.pdf
- HexDecOctBin 4y ago
  > About 350 people that go through the effort to submit papers, fight for them until the voting, everything that wins feature election lands into next ISO round. But what would be the point if major compilers refuse to implement these features? C++ is complex enough that it won't be easy (or even plausible?) for a new interested party to develop a high quality compiler. Is C++ going to become Microsoft's plaything?