This all makes sense and I don't doubt that it's worth it for you, I guess I just personally don't lean on commit history that much. I use git blame to find wh

This all makes sense and I don't doubt that it's worth it for you, I guess I just personally don't lean on commit history that much. I use git blame to find who touched the code, but not necessarily why. And during reviews I spent most of the time looking at the totality of the code changes (along with tests and PR notes) rather than deducing what's going on by looking at one commit at a time. Overall I see the history as a log, which is only an artifact and not a product on its own.