4 ms·
Lol, just look at comparative Infra-Red absorption. Equilibrium has little to do with the effect.
by TEP_Kim_Il_Sung 4y ago
Lol, just look at comparative Infra-Red absorption. Equilibrium has little to do with the effect.
- Schroedingersat 4y agoIt means that emissions are not cumulative. Without some other form of radiative forcing, any H2O you put into the lower atmosphere falls back out again or displaces H2O that would evaporate elsewhere. Otherwise the average lawn would be thousands of times worse than all other activity by the whoever lives there combined. Try a better concern trolling line.
- TEP_Kim_Il_Sung 4y agoYou will find warming mostly happens over richly foliaged parts of the planet, and a relationship between plant water retention and atmospheric CO2 concentration. (Leaf stomata shrink or expand depending on carbon starvation; Larger stomata increase plant inspiration, and water transpiration.) This is more pronounced on bigger leaves, so it's not lawns you should be looking at, but the natural carbon sequestering agents known as trees.