> It’s clear you have an ax to grind against the term capitalism I have no idea what that means. I think you're mixing up political/policy punditry with descri

> It’s clear you have an ax to grind against the term capitalism I have no idea what that means. I think you're mixing up political/policy punditry with descriptions of how the physical world actually works. The two are different (and often only very vaguely related). > Environmental degradation is not limited to, or primarily occurring in, capitalist societies Not relevant here (as it's not a claim I make). > Economic growth to a significant degree has been decoupled from resource usage Not even close, and 'resource usage' isn't the salient concept here. > population growth is not solved Population growth drops, (perhaps too far - to below replacement), everywhere with decent social security and health provision (where the latter includes birth control).